One Schoolhouse

  • STUDENT COURSES
    • School Information
    • Student Information
    • Parent & Guardian Information
    • Summer Courses
    • Register
  • ACADEMIC LEADERS
    • Association for Academic Leaders
    • Join the Association
    • Learning Innovation Blog
  • CONSORTIUM
    • Join the Consortium
    • Our Schools
  • COURSE LOGIN
  • STUDENT COURSES
    • School Information
    • Student Information
    • Parent & Guardian Information
    • Summer Courses
    • Register
  • ACADEMIC LEADERS
    • Association for Academic Leaders
    • Join the Association
    • Learning Innovation Blog
  • CONSORTIUM
    • Join the Consortium
    • Our Schools
  • COURSE LOGIN

Celebrating Ten Years

1/15/2019

0 Comments

 
PictureBrad Rathgeber
Back in 2009, a group of girls’ schools got together to create the first online independent school, the Online School for Girls.  The purpose was to connect schools and extend opportunities for students, in a way that was based the values, ethos, challenge, and feel of independent schools — with particular focus on relationships between students and teachers, and students with each other. The goal was to create an online school that wasn’t opposed to the tenets of independent school education, but instead brought those tenets online.

Along the way, the consortium recognized that online education could also be a great extender of opportunities for faculty, and thus the school created online professional development courses.  Later on co-ed schools and boys’ schools asked for similar opportunities. Eventually, the name “Online School for Girls” was not sufficiently encompassing of all of the work of the school. To capture the breadth of the work, the consortium renamed the school:  One Schoolhouse.

What started as an idea with four schools in 2009 quickly spread to twelve schools by the end of that year. In the first year, 50 students enrolled in semester courses, and just a handful of faculty tried to learn online. Ten years later, the network has impressively expanded. In the last year, 664 schools around the world enrolled students in more than 1800 semesters of classes, and 1000 educators in professional development programs.

The idea has been successful. This year, as a part of our 10th Anniversary celebration, we’d like to share with you the secret to that success. So, over the course of this year, we’ll offer 10 insights from 10 years in online independent education. In the process, we’ll offer examples from each insight, ideas on how these insights might hold value for your school, and a glimpse at what this means for the future of independent schools and their work online. Here’s the insights. Look for an in-depth look into the first insight in February.

Don't Let the Unknown Stop You From Acting
Use Research to Challenge Assumptions
Design Backwards, Then Measure
Every Student Learns Differently
Faculty Can Learn Online, Too
Online Learning Supports Financial Sustainability
Learning Online Solves Unique Challenges
Every Student Can Learn Online
Simple Design and Technology Improves Learning
​Choice Increases Student Engagement

0 Comments

Difficult Questions About Student Stress and Anxiety

1/7/2019

0 Comments

 
PicturePeter Gow
 The Independent Curriculum Group make no bones about our concern for the well-being and mental health of students, as nearly every day brings us a worrisome story or anecdote about student stress. Much of this appears to be very much a function of anxiety around the complex constellation of academic and social pressures felt by students working to succeed in the educational system we have created. We wonder about it, and what we as educators might do to make schools happier places for children and adults. Perhaps we’re just in alarmist mode, generalizing from specifics, but each time we ask a school person about students in crisis at their school, we get an affirmative response

So we present to you, readers, some difficult, discomfiting questions. You are invited to take these as either rhetorical or substantive (or both), and to frame your responses—not to us, but to yourselves—but in the context of your learning community accordingly.
  • Have you or the institution you represent noted and acknowledged an uptick in anxiety and anxiety-related behaviors among students?
  • Have you or the institution you represent engaged in tactical measures—hiring more counselors, more training of faculty, more…?
  • Have you or the institution you represent acknowledged likely systemic and situational sources of this uptick in anxiety and anxiety-related behaviors among students? 
  • Have you or the institution you represent considered countermeasures to reduce or ameliorate the systemic conditions that might underlie the uptick in anxiety and anxiety-related behaviors among students?
Following this line of inquiry may invite a kind of “blame game” that can situate responsibility on generalized targets like “the media,” “parents,” “colleges.” If these are apt or common responses (and they may well be), we need to drill down or, paradoxically, to start by ascending to a 30,000-foot level and considering what we do in the broadest sense.

All learning happens in a context, and in the established world of pre-college education we have planted our collective flag atop the mountain of missions and values (think: the accrediting process). We set out with good hearts to create institutions of teaching and learning built around these at least purportedly idiosyncratic, “mission driven” elements:
  • Cultures of learning comprised schedules, “grading” and assessment systems, administrative hierarchies, reward systems, professional learning expectations, age-cohort- and academic-discipline-related bureaucracies, and co-curricular offerings with their own hierarchies and systems of reward and recognition.
  • Intentional curricula, ostensibly and hopefully aimed at meeting the requirements of larger systems whose demands are more often perceived through our own institutional and personal lenses than clearly stated “from on high.”
  • Pedagogies that may be inventively designed or that cautiously default to the hackneyed and cliched, all providing student learning experiences with as broad a range of efficacies as of types.

Try putting on your skeptic’s (or hardcore realist’s) glasses and taking a look at the full context of learning at your school. It might be well to reserve some time for deep reflection as you ponder these related and very germane issues:
  • What is the “null curriculum” in your institution? That is, what is not taught or emphasized, leaving learners to infer that these things are unimportant or even, in some way, taboo or off limits? How might this message, however unintentionally implied, create a kind of cognitive or emotional dissonance in students’ minds and hearts?
  • What about the “hidden curriculum,” the ways in which certain structures, policies, sequences, or reward systems send messages about what is important that may be at odds with “official” or proclaimed values and beliefs? Is the very culture or organization of your institution in some way contributing to student apathy, cynicism, or angst?
  • Consider, for a moment, your school’s “best and brightest,” the students for whom stellar academic careers and accomplishments are forecast; they who will be, say, future National Merit Scholars or hyper-selective college or next-school admits. In the culture of your institution, how are the accomplishments of these students highlighted or rewarded?, In what ways (if any, to be sure) are the expectations placed on these students unlike those placed upon the generality of students. And in what ways (if any) might resources of certain kinds be directed toward these students in ways not entirely consonant with those “official” or proclaimed values and beliefs? Might this actually create undue or iniquitous pressure or stress that is less about a “student-centered” experience than about the needs or even that exaltation of the institution itself?
  • Does your school note or acknowledge an “achievement gap” or, equally unsettling, a comfort gap? Are members of certain groups less successful in your school, or do they feel less welcome and included in the culture and the programs? Do individuals in these groups, then—and we would include students, families, and faculty and staff here—experience your school (in any or all of its parts) differently, and perhaps as more stressful, than other members of your community?

There are of course a host of corollary and shadow (as in, “Why not?”) questions accompanying each of those asked here, but we’ll stop for now.
If you are inclined to explore these questions more deeply, we would point you to these terrific and relevant resources:
  • Challenge Success, an outgrowth of the work of Denise Pope and others. “We partner with schools, families, and communities to embrace a broad definition of success and to implement research-based strategies that promote student well-being and engagement with learning.”
  • The films of Vicki Abeles, especially Race to Nowhere and Beyond Measure
  • At What Cost? Defending Adolescent Development in Fiercely Competitive Schools by David L. Gleason, PsyD
  • Under Pressure: Confronting the Epidemic of Stress and Anxiety in Girls by Lisa Damour, PhD
  • The film Most Likely to Succeed and the book What School Could Be: Insights and Inspiration from Teachers Across America by Ted Dintersmith
  • Making Caring Common, part of the same Harvard Graduate School of Education project that produced the “Turning the Tide” report. “Collaborating with partners and engaging in national media work to amplify our messages and elevate the importance of developing children’s care for others and the common good in our public dialogue.” 

0 Comments

Flashback from 1999: Teachers' Technology Fears and Hopes

1/2/2019

0 Comments

 
PicturePeter Gow
This material comes from an early 1999 poll of teachers in New England. It's Interesting to muse on what has come true and what hasn't (yet?). 

Where were you in 1999, and what were your hopes and fears for education technology? 
​

Were you right or wrong?

Fears Relating to the Future of Technology in Education: 



Fears relating to teacher life
  • real change won’t come soon enough
  • learning to use takes so much time
  • I won’ t ever figure it out
  • if I don’t get it I won’t be able to teach it effectively
  • technology will suck up all our money and give too little in return
  • so much new stuff and new applications we’ll be overwhelmed
  • we’ll always be catching up and never learn to use it wisely
Fears relating to students and student learning
  • kids will become indiscriminate in use of references
  • too easy to be dishonest
  • it won’t help and it’s bad
  • poor quality of sources
  • that the Internet will continue to be perceived as a valuable and unique teaching resource (it’s not!)
Fears relating to curriculum and assessment
  • all homework will become simplified and flat linguistically
  • teachers and students will not be creative, self-motivated, curious, imaginative
  • diminished importance of books
  • less time for teacher collaboration and conversation
Fears relating to learning in general
  • people will become less creative with their hands, bodies, “natural things”; learning will become only cerebral
  • learning will slow due to added preparation time for teaching
  • kids will concentrate on the tools per se and not on using them effectively
General concerns
  • regulations
  • cost of access
  • government censorship and control of access

Hopes relating to the future of technology in education:

Hopes relating to teacher life
  • it’ll be wireless and easy to use
  • mastery will come sooner than we think
  • I can get a handle on it all
  • we will become familiar with technologies that can benefit us in and out of school
  • access to university and government libraries
  • anyone can submit legible or well-organized written work
  • access to the growing knowledge base will increase
  • more information will be accessible
Hopes relating to student learning
  • knowledge is power
  • it’ll make work easier
  • people will be empowered and independent
  • promotes editing and rewriting process
  • increasing clarity of science concepts with graphics capability
  • raise quality of teaching by making more mindful and knowledgeable teachers
  • raise quality of learning by really allowing kids to reach beyond “the text/the classroom etc.”
  • students will be more actively engaged in their own learning
  • learning can become more spontaneous
Hopes relating to curriculum and assessment
  • expand student and teacher knowledge and stimulate interest
  • it’ll make curriculum more exciting
  • help us teach students more efficiently
  • school will be more interesting and real
  • it’ll make language labs unnecessary
General reasons for optimism
  • democratization of access to information
  • freedom of speech
  • we’ll become wiser
  • low-cost access for all

0 Comments

    Don't miss our weekly blog posts by joining our newsletter mailing list below:

    Authors

    Brad Rathgeber (he/him/his)
    Head of School & CEO
    Beta Eaton (she/her/hers)
    Director of Student Support
    Corinne Dedini (she/her/hers)
    Assistant Head of School for Academics
    Elizabeth Katz (she/her/hers)
    Assistant Head of School for School Partnership
    Kerry Smith (she/her/hers)
    Instructional Designer for Professional Development
    Peter Gow (he/him/his)
    Independent Curriculum Resource Director
    Sarah Hanawald (she/her/hers)
    Assistant Head of School for PD & New Programs
    Sienna Brancato (she/her/hers)
    Program Manager for PD & New Programs
    Tracie Yorke (she/her/hers)
    Instructional Designer for Equity, Inclusive Innovation & Accessibility
    ​Lorri Palko (she/her/hers)
    Finance & Operations Advisor; CFO (retired)
    Karen Douse (she/her/hers)
    Director of School & Student Support (retired)

    Archives

    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    September 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    October 2013
    August 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    May 2012
    March 2012
    November 2011
    October 2011
    July 2011
    June 2002

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Organization

About
Welcome
​History
FAQs
​Calendar
​
Team Members
Board of Trustees
Employment Opportunities

Policies

Tuition & Policies
Non-Discrimination Policy
Technology Requirements & Policies
​Privacy Policy




School Resources

Advanced Independent Curriculum
​Partner Professional Learning Courses
Contact Us
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
info@oneschoolhouse.org
T: 202-618-3637​
© COPYRIGHT 2020, ONE SCHOOLHOUSE, INC.. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.